Sunday, December 17, 2006

'CASINO ROYALE' THE FILM WE DID SEE!  Posted by Picasa

19 comments:

panthergirl said...

So, did you love it? I did! And I didn't expect to...

Here via mIchele...

kenju said...

Pat, the way Michele's Meet n' greet works is this: you leave a comment for the person who signed above your name and then the next person will (or should) leave a comment for you. Some people also visit all the people who comment on their blogs - which is a nice thing to do to get started playing the game and increase your readership. So, Panthergirl should leave a comment for you and perhaps Jean-Luc will visit you after reading your comment. You can play multiple times, too.

Now and then you'll get a party-pooper who doesn't leave a comment for you, but if you presevere, others will!

PI said...

Hi panther girl and welcome. I enjoyed it - the cinema is a rare trest - but after years of complaining about James Bond and John Wayne to my husband I had to curb my delight somewhat:)

Judy: thank you for your helpful advice and whoopee - I'm off!

craziequeen said...

I have steadfastly refused to pay to see Casino Royale....

I'm not a Bond fan but I wanted Jason Isaacs to be the new Bond :-(

Here from Michele

cq

rashbre said...

and sometimes someone will even just drop by from Michele's because they see you are new!

I have not seen Casino Royale yet, but plan to during the week.

rashbre

PI said...

Welcome rashbre and thank you!

Yaeli said...

I hope you enjoyed the film! It's been so long since i've been to the cinema... I really must get there one day.
Michele sent me.

PI said...

cq: have tried and failed miserably to leave a comment on your blog. Sorry!

PI said...

Hi yaeli and welcome. I also go very rarely and DVD's just aren't the same are they?

Claire said...

I can't decide if I want to go and see this or not. I've never seen a James Bond film because none of them appeal but there is something about the advertising on this one that appeals.

Thanks for stopping by my blog!

PI said...

Hi Claire and welcome! Of its ilk Casino Royale is good. It's a bit noisy, a bit long but visually eye- popping and it was nice to know my husband wasn't bored out of his mind with a real 'lurve' story:)

Kath said...

Haven't seen the new one, but Connery is the best Bond. Connery... sigh :o)

Guyana-Gyal said...

I can't wait to see it...except the bits about people's arms getting cut off and so on. eek.

Do you know, we still get James Bond illustrated stories [can't call them 'cartoons' or 'comics'] in our newspaper.

PI said...

Kath: yes Sean takes a lot of beating but for a first timer Dan is good and he's certain very macho.

GG; I didn't tell you about Dan getting his bare bottom beaten - but I don't want to put you off:)

james higham said...

Past Imperfect, glad to find you through Blogpower - are you with us? By the way, are you now Present Perfect? Like the post on Casino Royale.

Gene Maudlin said...

Did you pick the wrong movie?

PI said...

Welcome James: you look great for 90!
I obviously need to discover Blogpower - then can answer your question. Just to confuse everybody my'story' is still in the past - 1953 to be exact but about to move smartly on. In between whiles I write in the present. Back to the story after Christmas. Confused?

Hi Hoss! The film was the right choice for marital relations and it wasn't boring. I'm just a sucker for love stories.

R. Sherman said...

Alright, dear, I'm confused.

Is this one of your "model" photos or one of you and the MTL in earlier years?

:)

Cheers.

PI said...

Randall: I don't believe you. You are the bright clear headed one. Also I was blonde and am not allowed to show MTL.